Rolex Datejust “White Roman Diamond Dial” 36mm Ref.16233 Box & Papers

Rolex Datejust “White Roman Diamond Dial” 36mm Ref.16233 Box & Papers

Marsoni

M251S

$3875.00

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

Rolex Datejust “White Roman Diamond Dial” 36mm Ref.16233 Box & PapersHere is a freshly serviced Rolex Datejust 36mm reference 16233, with a gorgeous White Roman Diamond Dial! It makes for a very unique and detailed look compared to a typical white roman dial and its rarer! Reference number: 16233 Serial number: X8****** serial which indicates production year 1991 COMES with BOX & PAPERS,BOOKLET (see second picture for everything thats included) 7750+ The watch is in overall excellent pre owned condition see pics for

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your Rolex Datejust “White Roman Diamond Dial” 36mm Ref.16233 Box & Papers orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your Rolex Datejust “White Roman Diamond Dial” 36mm Ref.16233 Box & Papers ships.

Need Help?
Questions about Rolex Datejust “White Roman Diamond Dial” 36mm Ref.16233 Box & Papers, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for Rolex Datejust “White Roman Diamond Dial” 36mm Ref.16233 Box & Papers in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

Just bought my second set of these.. first set lasted my healer almost 4 years and are still together but starting to split at the smaller seams so you can’t play as aggressive as my dog would like. We bought the second set and now she has her second wind! She loves tugging and I love knowing this toy will last a good while especially with an active dog!

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on January 4, 2025

Verified Purchase

Mary Rohrich

Charlottesville, US

★★★★★ 5

Doggy approved

Flavor Name: Chicken, Size: 12 Ounce (Pack of 1)

My dog loves them!

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on May 28, 2026

Verified Purchase

Phoenix, US

★★★★★ 5

Not long lasting, but preferred by my dogs and not smelly

Flavor Name: Chicken, Size: 12 Ounce (Pack of 1)

I have two pretty serious chewers. They prefer these bones over all of their longer-lasting dog bones, and these don't stink (which is more than I can say for most dog bones they like). I'm also less worried about digestion and choking hazards since these are rawhide-free. I buy these bones regularly and will continue to do so - just don't expect them to last more than a few minutes for big chewers.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on September 15, 2018

Verified Purchase

Brit

Lake Worth, US

★★★★★ 5

My lab loves them!!

Flavor Name: Chicken, Size: 12 Ounce (Pack of 1)

I am not a fan of the price and I don't know why they are so pricy, but my lab lives them so I will treat him every once in awhile. I love that these take awhile for him to eat giving him more time to enjoy them.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on June 27, 2021

Verified Purchase

Jacob

Houston, US

★★★★★ 4

Dog approved!

Flavor Name: Chicken, Size: 12 Ounce (Pack of 1)

My dog, a half pit bull and half chocolate lab, has a very sensitive stomach. With that in mind I have to always be wary of the things I buy her. With that in mind these seemed to work great! They don’t last as long as normal raw hide, so there is less “chew time” but she was excited when she received them! If your looking for a quick treat or reward for your dog these are great! If your looking for a bone/chewing alternative then these don’t quite meet that requirement.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on October 29, 2018