2004 Suzuki GSXR600 REAR BACK SHOCK ABSORBER SUSPENSION 62100-29G00-163 BB329 B

2004 Suzuki GSXR600 REAR BACK SHOCK ABSORBER SUSPENSION 62100-29G00-163 BB329 B

Marsoni

M251S

$18.00

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

2004 Suzuki GSXR600 REAR BACK SHOCK ABSORBER SUSPENSION 62100-29G00-163 BB329 BBike Breakers Canada 2004 Suzuki GSXR600 REAR BACK SHOCK ABSORBER SUSPENSION 62100 29G00 163 BB329 B This rear shock is in very good condition and shows normal signs of wear. The rear shock is dirty. Removed From: 2004 Suzuki GSXR600 with 16772 kilometers only . miles Please review all pictures to asses the condition of the item. Shipping We ship nearly all orders within 24 hrs and add tracking numbers to eBay as soon as we ship. If you have not

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your 2004 Suzuki GSXR600 REAR BACK SHOCK ABSORBER SUSPENSION 62100-29G00-163 BB329 B orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your 2004 Suzuki GSXR600 REAR BACK SHOCK ABSORBER SUSPENSION 62100-29G00-163 BB329 B ships.

Need Help?
Questions about 2004 Suzuki GSXR600 REAR BACK SHOCK ABSORBER SUSPENSION 62100-29G00-163 BB329 B, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for 2004 Suzuki GSXR600 REAR BACK SHOCK ABSORBER SUSPENSION 62100-29G00-163 BB329 B in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

I only look for leather when I’m purchasing dress shoes. Under the description “details” on this item it lists the shoe as leather upper and inner lining. A photo shows “genuine Napa leather lining”. If you keep reading (which I have now that I’ve received the shoes) it shows “faux leather” in the small print and that is not “leather”. I run a small leather business and this irks me because it’s clearly false advertising. The details also show the product is made in Brazil but when they arrived today, the shoe tag shows “Made in China” and “Man Made upper and lower”. I don’t hate the shoes. They look nice. What I know is they won’t hold up over time like leather, which is why the description should be accurate and not misleading.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on March 28, 2026

Verified Purchase

Amazon Customer

Natrona Heights, US

★★★★★ 5

I'll buy another pair for sure.

Size: 35W x 30L, Color: Black

Very nice pants. Lightweight and will be great for the summer. They fit as described.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on May 19, 2026

Verified Purchase

Barnes Family

Chelsea, US

★★★★★ 5

Truly amazing

Size: 38W x 28L, Color: Grey

Awesome pants! I love everything about them size, length, material and fit. I have never purchased a pair of pants that fit perfectly. I am truly amazed by this purchase. I WILL BE buying more pairs of these pants.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on November 29, 2025

Verified Purchase

Kindle Customer

Lexington, US

★★★★★ 4

Fits good just needs a light ironing.

Good fit with a casual look. These are a nice fit with an almost slim fit width at the bottom. I am a short guy and the 34x28 size fit me great. As I obviously don't have a trim waistline, I like that the bottom of these are narrower than a more dressier pant. The waist of my pants tend to move up and down approx. an inch to inch and a half and slacks tend to get under the heel of the less clunky modern dress casual shoe. Comparison below. Amazon Essentials 34x28 were a lot tighter (like a 32)in the waist and the length seemed loo long.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on August 17, 2018